Conversation
|
Commit: e180b82
12 interesting tests: 7 KNOWN, 4 flaky, 1 SKIP
Top 25 slowest tests (at least 2 minutes):
|
| ## Review Checklist | ||
|
|
||
| ### Code Quality | ||
| - [ ] Code follows the project's style guide and conventions |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Which are? Should it have a link?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I figured claude would figure out the style guide by osmosis. We can add a dedicated style guide later one. Things like acceptance tests could use style consolidation.
|
Good bot. Besides posting comments PRs, which is good for reviewing external contributions, can we just have a mode where it prints the review locally? |
|
@denik Printing the review locally is the default mode. You can at the end choose not to publish the review in the prompt. We can always add a flag later if you think that would make for a clearer interface. |
|
Here's a sample review today: This makes it explicit that these are request-only fields that should not affect drift detection. ================================================================================ Publish this review to GitHub? [y/N]: |
Changes
Adds a Python-based review bot tool (
tools/reviewbot.py) that uses Claude Code to assist with PR reviews.Features:
prompts/review.mdcovering:Usage
Why
An experimental tool to help out with initial PR reviews. Used it on: #4126